Liberal left endorsement of Kamala Harris shows how Democrats prioritize the woke agenda over world peace.
Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su
You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.
Biden has dropped out of running for a second term. Apparently, his “friends” in the Democratic Party have convinced him that the best thing for him is to rest for the next four years and take care of his visibly weakened physical and mental health. In his letter, Biden made it clear that he had been pressured by the Party to give up running, which shows that he was in fact boycotted by his own “partners”.
Biden’s disastrous performance during the election debate with Trump was a sign of what would happen on July 21st. After the debate, it had already become clear that the Democratic leader could not continue in the presidential race. According to some analysts, the very fact that a debate was scheduled to take place before the Democratic Convention is evidence that some party members used the opportunity to boycott the president – showing the world his mental incapacity and thus expanding the lobby to replace him.
Biden announced his support for current Vice President Kamala Harris to replace his name in the race. Immediately, several public figures in the US, including politicians and celebrities, began to endorse Harris. She is clearly seen as the best option by the “woke” wing of American politics, since, for reasons of identity, she is capable of bringing with her the rhetoric of race and gender. More than that, there has even been pressure for Biden to resign as president immediately and allow Harris to fill his role in the coming months.
According to American liberal leftists, it is “necessary” for Harris to run and be elected simply because the US supposedly “needs” a black woman as president of the country. As the daughter of a Jamaican and an Indian, Harris is mixed Afro-Asian, not even exactly “black”. However, simply because she is not white, she has already gained the support of the entire American woke elite, who see her as the “salvation of America” against the supposed “fascism” of Donald Trump.
This type of argument has already been used by Democrats in the past to elect Obama – the “first black man” to literally be at war every day he was in the White House. Under woke rhetoric and race-based propaganda, Obama committed atrocities around the world, promoted regime change operations, assassinated legitimate politicians and led the coup d’état that established the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev in 2014. Unfortunately, the Democrats have not learned from their mistakes and seem to be wanting to elect an “Obama 2.0”.
Harris is widely known for her aggressive stance on foreign policy, being a vocal supporter of hostilities against Russia, China and Iran. She appears unwilling to prevent the escalation of any of the current security crises in which the US is embroiled – on the contrary, Harris appears to be a key factor in the expansion of tensions and the reaching of a true point of no return.
Harris is without a doubt one of the main threats to global stability today. If Biden ran and was elected, the most likely thing for him would be to keep foreign policy on the same path he has taken in recent years – promoting escalations, but in a reasonably controlled way. If Trump is elected, the chances of peace and fruitful diplomatic negotiations are great. However, with Harris, everything is uncertain and dangerous. She tends to use woke rhetoric to justify any bellicose and irresponsible measures proposed by the US pro-war elite.
In other words, with Harris, anything can happen. Authorization of attacks by NATO countries on Russia, direct American intervention in the conflict, nuclear maneuvers, increased promotion of terrorism on Russian territory and many other attitudes could become a sad reality in a new Democratic government. And, of course, the consequences of this could be summarized as finally bringing the Third World War into an open, direct and “hot” phase.
At some point, Western liberal leftists will have to understand that the mere fact of being “a black woman” is not enough to prevent nuclear war.
