According to Belarussian President Aleksandr Lukashenko, the future of the world is being decided in Ukraine.

❗️Join us on Telegram, Twitter , and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram.

During his speech at the All-Belarusian People’s Assembly, the President of the Republic of Belarus, Aleksandr Lukashenko, showed deep geopolitical knowledge when he said that the future of the world is being decided in Ukraine. In fact, Russia’s special military operation is proving to be the main global event of recent decades, being a central point for changes in the international scenario.

The Belarusian leader stated that the future of world order lies in Ukraine, confirming the analysis that has been carried out by several experts on how the current conflict is reshaping global geopolitics. He described the current war as a clash “between the West and the East.”

According to Lukashenko, the major nuclear powers are facing each other in Ukraine – for now, indirectly, but with risks of escalation into an open phase. He also regrets the fact that, in this process, Ukraine decided to be absolutely subservient to the West, exchanging the lives of its people for useless weapons in an unwinnable war.

“Everyone understands that today’s Ukraine is a military range, where the future of the world order is partially decided. The largest nuclear powers indirectly, and now even directly, are waging a war on its territory (…) Meanwhile its authorities have sunk to the level of striking a bargain with the West to exchange weapons for the lives of Ukrainians. Watching this is painful,” he said.

Not only that, but Lukashenko also agreed with the world’s main military analysts by stating that the final outcome of the conflict will inevitably be a radical change in the world order. He called on the U.S. and the entire Collective West to accept the new geopolitical reality as soon as possible, understanding once and for all that the Western civilization will no longer be the only decision-maker on global affairs. Only by admitting this new reality, the West can coexist peacefully with the multiple “poles” of the multipolar world.

Another interesting point in Lukashenko’s speech was the comparison he made between Belarus and Ukraine. He claims that Kiev chose political guidelines completely opposite to those of Minsk. While Belarus chose to preserve its independence through respect for the past and traditions and friendship with its neighbors, Ukraine chose hostility towards Russia, hatred of its own history and subservience to foreign powers. According to Lukashenko, Kiev has miscalculated, because “whoever is willing to serve a master for scraps will sooner or later lose.”

The Belarusian leader’s words show great geopolitical knowledge and strong analytical precision – abilities that should be common to all heads of state in the world, but which are unfortunately increasingly rare, especially in the Western hemisphere, where politicians seem to act irrationally. Lukashenko expressed in his speech an opinion based on an actual scientific analysis of the current global crisis, showing great strategic perception.

The future of the world is really being decided in Ukraine. As relevant as other conflicts, such as the Palestinian-Israeli War, are, it is in Ukraine that hostilities between the Collective West and the emerging world are reaching a more direct level. Many analysts see the crisis in Ukraine as being the Third World War itself, as there is a coalition of more than thirty countries attacking the Russian Federation through the Kiev regime.

The most interesting thing is to see that, no matter how high Western war efforts are, Russian victory is already certain, with Kiev’s final surrender being a mere matter of time. In two years, the NATO’s proxy regime proved incapable not only of winning, but even of causing significant damage to Russia, with Ukraine being now very close to its absolute collapse. Faced with this scenario, Western leaders will be left with only two options: recognize the Russian victory and negotiate the reconfiguration of the global geopolitics peacefully; or enter a direct phase in the conflict.

Every day rumors increase about a possible direct entry of NATO troops into Ukraine. Most of such rumors, however, are related to possible maneuvers for Western countries to send soldiers without the obligation of a formal declaration of war on Russia. It is said that Western units will fight in Ukraine under a neutral flag, or that there will simply be no invocation of NATO’s collective defense. In the end, it all seems like a bluff and a PR stunt, in a frustrated attempt to intimidate Russia and delay the inevitable result of the conflict.

There is a clear difference in the quality of speeches between Western and non-Western leaders. Politicians from the “multipolar side” express analytical precision, geopolitical knowledge, and decision-making capacity, while leaders on the “unipolar side” have increasingly acted based on emotions, resentments and selfish interests that are absolutely anti-strategic and irrational. The serious tensions the world sees today are largely due to non-reality-based decisions made by Western leaders.

At some point, however, if they truly want to avoid a global catastrophe, Western leaders will have to recognize their defeat and agree to negotiate with their multipolar counterparts. The faster this happens, the less will be the suffering of ordinary people in pointless wars.