The depravity of Epstein’s parties in the 90s are about to be examined in grotesque detail giving the world’s media a gift they could hardly dream of. But is Trump setting his wife up to be his scapegoat?
Join us on Telegram
, Twitter
, and VK
.
Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su
The depravity of Epstein’s parties in the 90s are about to be examined in grotesque detail giving the world’s media a gift they could hardly dream of. But is Trump setting his wife up to be his scapegoat?
It could be the most controversial libel case in U.S. history but if Melania Trump goes ahead with her case against Hunter Biden – who repeated the claim that it was the disgraced financier Jeffry Epstein who introduced her to the U.S. president – history could be written not by the victors as Churchill once espoused but by the swamp itself in Washington which is out for Trump’s blood.
In barely a matter of days after sensational new allegations are published in a book by a British author about Prince Andrew’s sexual deviancy and his almost Stockholm Syndrome attachment to Epstein – which alleged that the prince was also close to Trump and that it was Epstein who introduced Melania to him – the first lady has threatened to make U.S. libel history by suing for defamation in a USD 1bn case.
In fact, days after the book hit the shelves, Andrew Lownie’s bombshell expose’s publishers had a swift rethink about how libel laws on both sides of the Atlantic could play into Trump’s hands and have the book pulped. They removed the key section which made the link between Epstein and Melania.
Critically, there is one simple, yet unadorned difference between U.S. and UK libel laws which forced them to do this. The book, The Rise and Fall of the House of York, originally claimed that it was Epstein himself who introduced Melania to Donald which, under English defamation law, its publishers would be obliged to prove, if contested. The claim is impossible to stand up and the publishers wisely didn’t give the Trumps an easy victory in having the book pulped entirely and possibly bankrupting both Lownie and his publishers. Lownie must be kicking himself now that he didn’t allude to Epstein’s tawdry circle of friends whose degenerate parties provided the opportunity for Melania to be introduced to the U.S. president.
That negligible point may well be the straw that breaks the camel’s back in the U.S. courts, given how U.S. libel law puts all the emphasis on the victim to prove the contrary to what is being thrown at them.
And this is where Melania’s case against Hunter Biden is far from clear cut and may well backfire on the Trump’s with Donald already drenched in gaudy allegations involving young girls from Epstein’s circle and his frequent trips to the former financier’s island – the epicentre of Epstein’s honey trap operation which filmed scores of celebs and international politicians fulfilling their most repugnant needs with teenage girls who were recruited and manipulated into acting as child prostitutes.
Until now, Trump’s real worry was that an unredacted FBI tome would have affirmed his trips there which Trump foolishly to this day still denies, despite the considerable evidence stacked up against his claim. Yet Melania’s threat to Hunter Biden could open up a whole new tin of wriggling miniature serpents which collectively could destroy the Trumps.
Under U.S. law it will be down to her to prove that it was not Epstein himself who introduced her to Trump, yet the arduous process that this will entail will be excruciatingly embarrassing and harmful to the first lady as her whole story of how she arrived in the U.S. and what her links were to Epstein will have to come out. Her real story will almost certainly be more damaging to her when it becomes public knowledge, lined up against the somewhat trivial truth of who specifically it was who introduced her to Donald. Everything from the still unanswered question about whether she worked in the U.S. illegally right through to her somewhat overzealous ambitions to marry an American billionaire will be placed under the spotlight for the first time with ‘absolute privilege’ for journalists to write it all up in grotesque detail. ‘Gold digger’ is going to be a term used by the tabloid press a lot. Melania’s story will break all records and dwarf all previous Trump scandals as the entire world’s press will go overboard on this nude model’s character and distasteful allegations made about her conduct. Think Death of Diana 2.0. It’s a publisher’s dream which even comes with nude photos to accompany salacious kiss-n-tell stories of vice, under-aged girls and debauchery that perhaps conservative America isn’t quite ready for – and can’t take when presented as an unpalatable sex scandal which rocks the entire political establishment, making the Monica Lewinsky triste with Bill Clinton look almost endearing.
The 90s in the U.S. were like the 60s in the UK in terms of political hedonistic liberty. While Clinton was enjoying the carnal offerings of a White House intern in 1995, this is where Melania Knauss’s story begins when she arrives in NYC and it is suggested works illegally without a work visa.
Around that same period it was Ghislaine Maxwell who was linked to a modelling agency run by a Paulo Zampolli whose outfit would play a focal role in the whole Epstein saga as it was a supply line of attractive women who attended parties hosted by both Epstein and Trump. Some may claim that Zampolli holds a number of potentially damaging secrets about Melania and Donald perhaps explaining why he was given a highly paid position in Trump’s administration announced back in March. Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence is likely to be pardoned by Trump as it would seem that she has agreed to testify that the U.S. president had no contact whatsoever with underage girls and behaved impeccably whenever she saw him at the parties – a shocking and barely believable whitewash which, during a two day interview, gets Trump off the hook but also notably Prince Andrew who Maxwell claims didn’t have sexual relations with Virginia Giuffre.
to be continued
