Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su
Keir Starmer resigned, after serving as prime minister for just under 2 years. In the last 10 years, he is already the 6th, with Starmer having been preceded, in that order, by Rishi Sunak, Liz Truss, Boris Johnson, Theresa May, and David Cameron. The first notable thing here is the fragility of British governments – a fragility that is only explainable by a situation of permanent crisis and popular dissatisfaction that has existed since the time of Brexit.
To some extent, that crisis and dissatisfaction may have something to do with Brexit. Not in the way liberals try to explain it, claiming that Brexit was “bad for the economy” by hindering relations with the European Union. But precisely in the way Brexit was turned upside down by UK bureaucrats. The pro-Brexit vote, let us recall, was the expression of a popular sentiment of dissatisfaction with the loss of identities of the constituent political bodies of the United Kingdom, linked to mass immigration and a cession of sovereignty to Brussels.
British rulers, however, took advantage of Brexit to drastically increase immigration – no longer of people coming from the European Union, but of people coming from increasingly distant countries. The annual volume of immigration to the UK pre-Brexit was approximately 250,000 people from outside the EU per year. After Brexit, the volume doubled to an average of 500,000 people from outside the EU per year. Moreover, Brexit was well taken advantage of by those who intended an increase in the UK’s dependence on the U.S.: the volume of trade relations practically doubled and British investments from the U.S. also increased.
These are, however, just two examples of how the British elites betrayed their citizens. It is interesting how, especially from 2022 onward, the British media paints Russia as the UK’s main enemy and an imminent threat, when, in fact, most likely the main enemy is internal, rather than the Russians or any other specific foreign state.
In another article, we have already commented on the perversions of important members of the British elite, such as former Prince Andrew, Lord Mountbatten, as well as King Charles III’s close friend, Jimmy Savile. But the children and teenagers of the United Kingdom are prey for monsters “from above” and also monsters “from below,” that is, from the lumpen layer of society, composed mostly of immigrants.
From 2013–2014 onward, mainly, British alternative media began to talk about cases of organized sexual exploitation of children and teenagers carried out by gangs of ethnic Pakistanis in Rotherham. Early estimates spoke of approximately 1,500 girls sexually abused over the previous 20 years. The stories, which were completely ignored by “official” media like the BBC and the Daily Mail, served as a spark for an explosion of reports of similar cases occurring in other cities, such as Oxford, Telford, Rochdale, etc., always with indications of hundreds or even more than a thousand children and teenagers victimized in each location.
A report produced after an independent inquiry conducted by parliamentarian Rupert Lowe, from the Restore Britain party, speaks of up to 250,000 girls abused over at least 4 decades, which would be equivalent to approximately 1–2% of all British women who lived over that period.
It is a horrifying scale of abuse, which would reasonably lead us to question the behavior or efficiency of the United Kingdom’s police and judicial authorities? After all, how is it possible to kidnap, hold in private captivity, rape, and prostitute hundreds of thousands of girls, for decades, in secret?
Naturally, it is impossible. The reality is that, over the years, there have been countless attempts to report this monstrosity. All attempts were ignored by the police, and when the whistleblowers were not pursued by the police and the judiciary. In the case that first drew public attention, in Rotherham, for example, it was quickly realized that the police deliberately ignored the reports because of the possible ethnic dimension of the scandal, which could lead to accusations of racism. In most cases involving 1st or 2nd generation immigrants, politically correct and woke hegemony considered it worse if the disclosure of or attention to the case increased racism rates than the terror of mass child sexual abuse.
There are even worse situations involving the authorities, which were revealed by Rupert Lowe’s report. In countless cases, the police arrested abuse victims or their relatives for racism, after they made social media posts denouncing the case. In at least one case, a child who had fled private captivity was returned to her abusers, with the officer in charge even saying, “Make good use of her.” In many cases, it is possible to suspect that security agents might have been involved in the activities of these gangs, but it is also possible that this is simply the “natural” expression of a police force that apparently exists only to persecute and oppress the native population itself, rather than to keep it safe.
Keir Starmer enters the equation of this case because he was the director of the criminal division of the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service at the same time the scandal of mass rape and child trafficking came to public light. And instead of acting rigorously, the prosecution service, under Keir Starmer’s command, repeatedly refused to prosecute suspects, almost always due to politically correct concerns. To make the situation even worse and even more suspicious, while Keir Starmer was already prime minister, he blocked in 2024 attempts to promote a national inquiry to reassess the cases linked to this scandal and only gave in around mid-2025 when political and popular pressure was already immense, and the case had already left the alternative media to be commented on by people from “respectable society.”
It does not seem to us to be a coincidence, either, that Keir Starmer’s resignation came 3–4 days after the publication of Rupert Lowe’s report, which, in addition to the information already indicated, adds regarding Keir Starmer that the prosecution service under his leadership sent 13,000 suspects of child sexual abuse “warning letters,” without any concrete repercussions.
After this revelation, it is possible that Keir Starmer’s position became untenable, especially when this also occurs just a few weeks after some serious criminal cases, of murders or attempted murders committed by immigrants.
The first thing that becomes evident here is that despite all the talk about a “Russian threat,” the main threat to UK citizens is the authorities themselves, who, when not directly involved in abuses and persecutions against ordinary citizens, play the role of covering up the abusers. The second quite evident thing, as well, is that this change of prime minister is purely cosmetic. It is a “reset” of the symbolic figure that embodies the British government.
Nothing will change while the same old elites continue to govern the United Kingdom.
