NATO knows that, once they incessantly beat their war drums and get their entire orchestra strumming along, their propaganda will easily carry the day in The War of the Words.
Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su
Because the 24th April Armenian Genocide Remembrance day is once more upon us, I thought I could best commemmorate it by bringing together some media-related threads it has with more recent genocides and pogroms, not only in Western Armenia but in all of west Asia, Africa and other places that likewise rarely make the news.
The Turkish genocide of the Armenians, Assyrians and Pontic Greeks was a tool Western bull frogs like Winston Churchill used to attack Germany, Ottoman Turkey’s main Great War ally and, in that, as Sven Lindqvist’s superlative Exterminate all the Brutes shows, it was just a re-run of Albion’s attack on the Belgian Congo’s genocides to warn Belgium against getting too close to pre-Great War Germany; although Belgium committed unspeakable war crimes in the Congo, Lindqvist convincingly shows that British-ruled Africa, where savages like Henry Moron Stanley were given free rein, was no better, and that is worth remembering when we think of all the Africans, who were transported to Europe and the United States to be exhibited as circus freaks for the amusement of the paying masses.
When Africans, Asians or any others are held in such low esteem, it is easy to flip the switch and exterminate them. Such was the case with the Japanese, after Time Magazine’s 22 December edition led with their notorious “How to tell your friends from the Japs” front page editorial. Not only did that rabidly racist editorial lead to the mass incarceration of Americans of Japanese descent but, as I previously pointed out, the USMC’s Pacific War was a racist war of extermination, a rosary of war crimes by any metric.
Nor was Time’s call for a war of Japanese extermination a once-off. Here is The Economist demanding war without mercy on Saddam Hyssein’s Iraq (a bad guy, so slaughtering over a million Iraqi infants is worth it, just as The Economist’s earlier 1st August 2002 edition proclaimed America’s Iraqi genocide was fully fully justified). Here is The Economist’s Leader shilling for Obama to pursue a policy of genocide in Aghanistan and here, at the 2001 start of the Afghan genocide, is the same Economist’s leader telling us that NATO’s Afghan genocide is “a heart-rending but necessary war”.
And Stephen Karganovic‘s Serbs? Here is the front page of Time (how to tell your friends from the Japs) screaming that we must “bring the Serbs to heel” even if that entails blasting the lot of them to kingdom come. Bring them to heel? Are the Serbs two-legged dogs that they must be trained to kowtow at their Western masters’ feet? NATO’s media certainly think so.
And then there is The Economist’s final solution to the Syrian problem which is, according to its 31 August 2013 leader, to hit Assad hard. Assad, last I heard, is stiill standing, but over a million Syrians are dead in this ongoing NATO genocide which is, no doubt, at least as worth it as was NATO’s Iraqi genocide.
Not that NATO has totally turned its back on Syria. Here is the BBC’s Lina Sinjab telling us, in a story accompanied by an Arab in a niqāb, that the Syrians, who are being currently massacred, never had it so good. Checking out this Syrian patriot’s wikipedia page, we see she has contributed more often to MI6’s Chatham House shenanigans than she has to MI6’s broadcast media but let’s listen to her drivel all the same even if all it does is regurgitate MI6’s concern about women in Afghanistan after MI6 surrendered those same women to the Taliban.
Because there is no danger of the likes of Sinjab ever speaking truth to power, she will never run into the type of flak Iris Chang experienced for her excellent The Rape of Nanking. Iris Chang, it must be noted, was a journalist not an academic, and her book was a first class piece of journalism and, if journalism is history’s first rough draft, then Chang did a marvellous job in that respect and one very few Western journalists will ever do, unless they want to follow Gary Webb‘s example and be dragged through the mud and assassinated for their trouble.
Although one of Karganovic’s recent articles was on the pending exposure of yet another NATO false flag job, and a recent editorial covered the Bucha false flag massacre, and I have repeatedly drawn attention to Robert Stuart’s excellent exposé of a BBC orchestrated Syrian false flag chemical gas attack operation, none of those, at day’s end, amount to much.
That is because NATO knows that, once they incessantly beat their war drums and get their entire orchestra strumming along, their propaganda will easily carry the day in The War of the Words. Though this this can most clearly be seen in the Orson Welles’ 30th October 1938 radio rendition of HG Wells’ ‘The War of the Worlds’ to an incredulous American audience who thought the Martians had captured their country, people are always easily fooled and few swim against the tide when “the Japs” or anyone else are getting it the neck.
Although the Vatican is to be commended for bringing Nigeria, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and similar killing fields to our attention, even leaving their obvious conflicts of interests in such places as Ukraine and Archbishop Romero’s El Salvador to one side, they are decidedly short on how we, the ordinary people, can make a tangible difference to matters.
Although we can march around like the Duke of York once did in protest over Gaza, that cuts little ice with those who call the shots and, if we break the law, as some pro Palestinian protesters do, then we are either jailed, deported or, at the very least, judicially debarred from ever being active again.
We can, of course, join the Pope in bringing these ongoing atrocities to the attention of our political masters but, in a world where Slovakia’s pro-Russian (sic) Robert Fico (recently shot five times but what about it?) has been threatened by Estonia’s James Bond (aka Kaja Kallas) that, if he goes to Moscow, those five NATO slugs will be the least of his problems, political pygmies like Kallas, Baerbock and von der Leyen want us all to stay not only in our lane and but under their yoke as well.
And, though those terms are totally unacceptable from a moral point of view, they are also totally unacceptable from a tactical point of view because the examples adumbrated above, as well as countless others like them, show that St Paul’s “powers of darkness” will continue their unspeakable atrocities until they are stopped once and forever and, if we ordinary Joe Soaps are to do anything of merit, it is to listen to and amplify the arguments of “the Japs”, the Serbs, Syrians, Armenians, Assyrians, Africans, Ivans, Greeks and everyone and anyone else NATO is currently lining up for the chopping block.
