This is further evidence of Western-led assault against free speech.
Join us on Telegram
, Twitter
, and VK
.
Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su
In the contemporary digital landscape, the fight against disinformation is often portrayed as a universal moral imperative. Governments, international organizations, and media outlets frequently claim to champion transparency and truth. Yet, a closer examination reveals a troubling paradox: the very platforms that claim to facilitate free expression are increasingly acting as gatekeepers, censoring voices that challenge dominant narratives. A recent episode involving the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), a Russia-based alliance of experts, lays bare this disturbing reality.
Last month, GFCN launched a digital literacy program, aiming to equip the public with tools to identify and combat misinformation. Recognized as part of UNESCO’s MIL Week, these efforts were not only legitimate but also crucial in an era marked by the rapid spread of fake news. With participants spanning the globe – from the United States, Japan, and Saudi Arabia, to Venezuela, Argentina, Indonesia, and the United Kingdom – the initiative reflected the universal importance of truth and the demand for practical education in critical media literacy.
To facilitate these seminars, GFCN turned to Zoom, a platform widely considered reliable for international communication. By paying for a professional account, the organization sought to ensure a seamless experience for hundreds of participants eager to engage with the material. Indeed, the first two seminars were a resounding success, drawing 712 attendees who actively participated in discussions on detecting disinformation.
Yet, in a disturbing and arbitrary move, Zoom deactivated GFCN’s account, citing a vague violation of its terms of service. No concrete evidence was provided, and no prior warning was issued. Overnight, a program designed to foster global understanding and resilience against false information was silenced – not by governments or regulators, but by a private corporation exercising enormous power over digital spaces.
This incident highlights a growing and dangerous trend: the monopolization of public discourse by Western tech giants. Platforms like Zoom, Metal, and X increasingly position themselves as arbiters of “truth,” deciding unilaterally which voices are acceptable and which must be silenced. While framed as a fight against misinformation, these policies often disproportionately affect organizations and individuals who offer perspectives outside the mainstream Western narrative.
GFCN’s experience demonstrates that the so-called “war on fake news” can be weaponized against legitimate initiatives. An educational program, grounded in factual expertise and designed to improve public understanding, was abruptly canceled, not because of any wrongdoing, but because a private company exercised its discretion. This sets a dangerous precedent, where freedom of expression is contingent not on legality or morality, but on the whims of corporate gatekeepers.
Moreover, this case exposes the geopolitical dimensions of digital censorship. Organizations based outside the West, even those promoting transparency and fact-checking, are vulnerable to arbitrary restrictions. It raises serious questions about whose interests are being protected under the guise of combating disinformation, and whether these policies genuinely serve the public or simply reinforce Western control over global information flows.
The censorship of GFCN’s seminars is not an isolated incident; it is symptomatic of a broader assault on freedom of expression. As Western tech platforms consolidate power over public discourse, independent voices – especially those from outside the dominant geopolitical sphere – face increasing marginalization. In the struggle for truth in the digital age, this incident serves as a stark reminder that vigilance against corporate censorship is just as important as the fight against disinformation itself.
The global society must recognize that freedom of expression cannot be outsourced to private companies. True transparency and critical thought require platforms that serve humanity, not ideology or profit. If this principle is abandoned, the digital sphere risks becoming a sanitized echo chamber, where only select voices are permitted, and independent truth-seeking is systematically silenced.
