Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

May 9 does not mean the same for all the nations of Europe. Which could be surprising, even absurd, since the date represents the defeat of Nazi-fascism, the greatest continental scourge of the last centuries.

May 9 is Victory Day, the evocation of a day of unrestrained joy for all the peoples of the European continent. Celebrations of a light and relieved awakening after an endless nightmarish night.

This joy overflowed without restraint, for moments without any stains or shadows on their faces, despite the fact that almost all those who celebrated freedom had at least one family member killed or injured during the six years of conflict; to which we must add the three catastrophic years of the Spanish Civil War, the first and bloody image stamped by Nazi-fascist terrorism.

Despite the act of freedom, humanism, hope and democracy that was the signing of peace on the ruins of the Hitler regime, two anniversaries are now being celebrated evoking the 9th of May: the peoples of Europe and the governments of nations that contributed the most and suffered the most to make peace possible, mark the 80th anniversary of Victory Day; the governments of the «Western Allies», who are scrambling to save themselves from the shipwreck of this artificial entity they called the European Union, are celebrating Europe Day. Not the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi-fascism, but the 75th anniversary of a so-called Schuman Declaration, which they considered the first step in the process of European integration. It is a case to ask what there is to celebrate. And the people of the 27 would do so if they were given the opportunity to have their say on the subject at all.

Fleeing the celebration of the defeat of Nazism

The governments of the European Union limit themselves to signalling Hitler’s defeat in bureaucratic and restricted ceremonies of their declassed political classes and in which the people do not and could not fit. And they do it with zero conviction, zero emotion, zero memory and 100% falsified history; and, at the same time, in a provocative spirit, confirming at the present time the treacherous and mystifying intentions with which the Western powers were forced, for the sake of survival and terror in the face of Hitler’s shredding apparatus, to make an alliance with the Soviet Union.

It is not worth talking about the ingratitude of governments that exclude Russia from their plastic celebrations. They organize them to pretend, perhaps afraid of the image of insensitivity that the omission could still entail; and also with obvious propagandistic intentions, to give free rein to his schizophrenic pathology, and already very deep-rooted, induced by the cult of the dishevelled «Russian threat». The paid advertising campaign of Portuguese television on the extreme virtues of «Europe Day» – with the inappropriate participation of UNICEF, totally in defiance of the UN statute – did not hide its intentions to brainwash an evocation unknown to everyone. This translates the irremediable certainty of the autocrats of the European Union that there is a total disconnect between them and the peoples of the continent.

These procedures of the political castes of the European Union reveal, at the same time, the ambivalence of their governments and predecessors towards Nazi-fascism. Using it in the 30s and 40s of the last century as an instrument to try to materialize the fixed idea of destroying the Soviet Union; a strategy that ended up failing in military terms and that, despite this, has now been resumed against the Russian Federation, arm in arm with Ukrainian Nazi-Banderism, by the way inherited and inspired by the murderous Nazism of the Third Reich. Denying this evidence is a governmental and media practice that has become mandatory to build the single militaristic and militarized opinion that they want to foist on us and also a reason to vulgarize the persecution against citizens who demonstrate, without appeal, the Nazi character of the Kiev regime and defend a negotiated solution to the conflict.

For all these reasons, the governments of the European Union do not feel comfortable marking the fall of Nazi-fascism alongside the current representatives of a people and a country without which they would not be who they are. Or perhaps they were, perhaps, because a victorious Nazism could recycle itself, with the passage of time, in the form of a liberal democracy like today’s, applying neoliberalism as a recipe for maximum exploitation of the peoples. We feel it well all around us.

The dawn of freedom cost 26.6 million dead

When they find it necessary, albeit grudgingly, to talk about the outcome of the Second World War, the governments of the European Union and their totalitarian media apparatus fill our eyes and ears with the strategically overrated Normandy landings.

A remarkable military feat, no doubt, in which the US troops, after years of seeing where fashions stopped, ended up playing an important role against a Nazi machine much weakened and demoralized by the failures in the East.

There would be no landing in Normandy, however, without more than 26.6 million Soviets having sacrificed themselves to contain the overwhelming Hitlerian advance to the East, with the primary objective of conquering the Soviet Union. More than 26 million people… two and a half times the current population of Portugal. And although it seems cruel to evoke it, because it is a matter of resorting to bloody arithmetic, four times more than the victims of the Holocaust. The shameless Zionist hijacking of this tragedy makes it absolutely necessary to reflect on the numbers used to justify a sinister expansionist propaganda. These are numbers that our governments should not forget, if they were aware, a rare commodity in these lands.

When Hitler’s troops faced the Normandy landings, the amputation of their troops from the campaign in the East had reached 8.6 million troops; had lost about 75% of their tanks and planes in the Soviet Union, plus 74% of their artillery guns and mortars. During the six years of war the Soviet people razed 607 German divisions; The Western Allies would go on to crush 176 divisions.

The conditions for the Normandy landings became possible after the containment of Nazi troops at the gates of Moscow in the autumn of 1941, the first military defeat of the Reich and which put an end to the myth of the “lightning war”.

The population of Leningrad, for its part, resisted victoriously 872 days of savage siege, in which one million people died of starvation, disease and German bombings. The hypocritical Western governments of today refuse to recognize the genocide against the Soviet people, but Germany prides itself on making material reparations to the heirs of families who were victims of the siege: as long as they declare themselves Jews. German complicity with Zionist fascism and segregationism could not be more repugnant.

After the Nazi defeat in the long and deadly battle of Stalingrad, in which Hitler’s troops lost a million and a half troops between 1942 and 1943, the course of the Second World War was reversed; following martyrdom and prolonged Soviet resistance, the total defeat of the Reich became possible from then on.

This was followed by the terrible and decisive battle of Kursk in 1943, which involved the largest number of tanks ever and whose immediate consequence was the landing of US and British troops to accelerate the liberation of Italy and remove Mussolinian fascism from the field. Operation Bagration, which then allowed the Soviet Union to liberate Belarus, Poland and Lithuania in 1944, had an incalculable strategic weight in the successes of the offensive on the western front, which began in June of that year.

In the victorious cavalcade to Berlin, liberating Poland, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Norway, Bulgaria, Romania, Austria, much of Germany, saving the survivors of many of the hells of the Nazi concentration camps, the Soviet Union lost another million soldiers.

History Revised by Mercenaries and Counterfeiters

The history revised by some mercenaries and forgers, Western historians claiming that only the Western Allies liberated concentration camps, was born in the catacombs where deranged minds conspire to try to replace factual reality with their lies.

When they exclude Russia from the commemorations of the Nazi defeat, the governments of the Western powers explain who they are and what really moves them: they only mark their own victories, which would have been impossible without the sacrifice of the Soviet people, but they do not fail to demonstrate that they have not been able, to this day, to disguise their disenchantment with the fact that the Soviet Union survived the Nazi invasion. So, it is not difficult for us to understand the current rage of the US empire and the colonialism of the European Union against the Russian Federation and the willingness to do everything possible and impossible with the aim of dismantling it. In practical terms, they risk causing the devastation of the continent, on the verge of extinguishing life on the planet to try to achieve what not even the hordes of Hitler, Napoleon and others before them, the Swedes, for example, achieved.

It is a natural behaviour and it is not surprising that the European Union prefers to celebrate 9 May not as Victory Day but as ‘Europe Day’, in this case the 75th anniversary of the ‘Schuman Declaration’, considered the kick-off of European integration.

It was then realized, as it continues to be, that this process was nothing more than a way to perpetuate the military, economic and political control of the United States over Europe. So much so that it was enough for the lunatic Trump to threaten that this conservatorship could end and soon the European Union buried itself in an orphan crisis with a suicidal vocation.

The fallacy of the United States of Europe

The so-called “fathers of Europe” or grandparents of Europe, or rather, two of whom – Schumann himself and the Italian Alcide de Gasperi, are in the process of being canonized by the Holy See, thus sanctifying the birth of the inhuman European Union – have associated the process of continental integration with the creation of a United States of Europe. A twisted, opportunistic, undemocratic and, above all, very artificial idea.

As if it were possible to merge into a federative magma countries, nations and peoples of Europe with their identities, cultures, traditions, languages and even national rivalries, each with a deep-rooted personality and, moreover, many of them with centuries and centuries of independence. Making this parallel and intending to give it shape generated a situation that is impossible to materialize and that continues to cost us very dear in terms of human and social dignity. A process of this kind can only be imposed from the top down, through lies and authoritarianism, in the opposite direction to democracy.

The US regime and the federal state have nothing to do with deep and real Europe. They were born on the extermination of native peoples and have been consolidated, in just 250 years, through the union of non-sovereign states, almost all of them – except those stolen from their neighbours – demographically and culturally homogeneous, without history and with the same language. And yet, this process only achieved unification after a bloody civil war between the confederal and federal options.

Only idealists or, much more likely, lying and opportunistic post-war conspirators in the service of interests opposed to those of the European peoples could impose this path to impossible integration. That is why, in the end, in the full awareness of their fraudulent intentions, they have eradicated popular consultations and referenda from any stage leading to the European Union and even to a single currency. Konrad Adenauer, the first post-Nazi chancellor of the Federal Germany, himself surrounded by recycled Nazis, including in the formation of the secret police, hastened to declare that referendums were unconstitutional.

Even the idea of creating, as an alternative, a confederation of sovereign states, as General De Gaulle proposed, was flatly set aside by the founding core of integration, because it “subverted NATO” by creating a European army – without US tutelage – and structuring a common foreign policy.

It is worth remembering the intentions expressed by the founding fathers and acolytes, such as Winston Churchill, and comparing them with today’s reality. It will not be difficult to conclude that 75 years ago we lived in a fiction, transformed today into a parallel reality cultivated by the Orwellian propaganda apparatus, which operates light years from the will and interests of the peoples.

Robert Schuman, French Foreign Minister, said: ‘The creation of a European federation is essential for the preservation of peace.’

Jean Monnet, historically considered the main progenitor of the European Union and also the inspirer of the Schuman Declaration, did not, however, emerge from political circles. He was a cognac merchant and banker with interests in the United States, a shadowy behind-the-scenes personality who never ran for any political office. He said: “Only a European federation can make war unthinkable and materially impossible.” Moreover, “there will be no peace in Europe if states are reconstituted on the basis of national sovereignty and all that it implies.”

Churchill’s ideas coincided but always wrapped up in imaginative phrasing. According to the former British Prime Minister, “only supranationality can eliminate the European evils of nationalism and warmongering.” Moreover, states “are too small to prosper alone” and within a United States of Europe “workers will be able to regain joy and hope.” While the German Chancellor Adenauer proclaimed that the reconciliation of nations “is possible only by their integration into a supranational association.”

Could it be that our founding fathers or grandparents were wrong in their predictions or were they already putting us in an eleven-rod shirt using soft and poisonous words, in what are followed by today’s political classes, made autistic and self-sufficient in their mediocrity, illiteracy and mellifluous and suicidal authoritarianism?

The founders had the decorum not to abuse the word democracy – they were even quite restrained. The heirs, however, proclaim in its place a corruption, the so-called liberal democracy, an adjective that serves for everything, even to try to kill any democratic remnant.

The initiators of the process of European integration openly assumed federalism; Their successors today practice it but hide it, they steal our sovereignty by invoking the defence of national interests, in short, in their ineptitude and with the help of authoritarian manipulation they are even more hypocrites and liars.

False Birth Promises

The forefathers of the European Union guaranteed that integration was a measure against nationalism and warmongering. What do we have today? More nationalisms, warmongering and Nazi-fascism returning, in old or updated forms, looked upon with benevolence by our political classes, ready to use them as instruments of their interests. It is seven and a half decades of mystification, manipulation and lies that the governments of the European Union celebrate, instead of the defeat of Nazi-fascism.

The alliance between the pro-European leaders and the various forms of Nazi-fascism in affirmation is not something embryonic or unnatural. At stake is not only involvement in the defence of Kiev’s Banderism; the implicit, often explicit, support for the genocide practiced by Zionism against the Palestinian people, accepting Israel as the “only democracy in the Middle East” and representative of the “civilization and cultural superiority of the West”, makes the governments of the European Union co-authors of a massacre that takes us back to the times of the horrors of the Holocaust. Israel is Zionism and Zionism is a supremacist, racist, apartheid and fascist doctrine – the words are there to be used. And they are not anti-Semites, they are anti-Zionists, concepts that are not only different but opposite.

The founding fathers of this now moribund European Union insisted on the fundamental role of European integration and federalism in defending peace and creating the conditions to make war impossible. Seventy-five years later, the governments of the European Union invest what they have and, above all, what they do not have in a shameful war effort in defence of a fascist regime, not hesitating to dismantle the already precarious social structures of most of the 27 member countries; and plunging European populations into demeaning levels of poverty, the suppression of many of their civil and human rights and blatant situations of inequality.

They thus intend to prepare, without a trace of humanism, to throw a generation of young Europeans into the bonfire of war, a tragedy that they say they cherish as a virtuous path to peace. Brussels and almost all the governments of the 27, that “Christian and Western” elite, are autistic even before the Popes, both Francis and the current Leo XIV who, in his first interventions, made a piercing appeal for peace and the “end of the third world war piecemeal”, which he reinforced with the cry of “war never again”. Peace, as we know, has become a cursed word in the European Union. There will be no lack of those in Brussels and in these capitals who will pronounce the sentence that the new Pope is going down the wrong path.

The European Union cannot, and will not, as long as it exists, celebrate 9 May as Victory Day. It is the natural order of things.

In this context, we all have a great challenge on our hands: to do what we can to make it unnecessary to celebrate what they call Europe Day, which means freeing the peoples of Europe from the shackles of the European Union.