Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

The backbone of Washington’s action will be the same. For now, despite the changing world, the empire is still the empire.

The approval by the Washington Administration and immediate execution by the Nazi regime in Kiev of the launch of U.S.-produced tactical missiles known as ATACAM against Russian territory is a sign of the desperation that NATO and the Western world are going through in the face of the perceived military defeat, once again, now on Ukrainian territory.

The most tragic and dangerous element of this decision by the real head of NATO to directly involve the alliance in the war against Russia is the fact that it was taken by a defeated and transitional U.S. president, senile and admittedly demented – always a sociopath – considered incapable of running for re-election but not of creating an imminent situation of nuclear war.

This is how the West works today: despair in the face of military defeat in a proxy war in which NATO – mainly the European Union – have invested almost everything, especially in budgetary resources and weapons, in addition to the squandering of essential means for their economies, leads to irresponsibility; And this, in turn, leads to decisions calling into question the survival of the eight billion people, as many as there are on the planet, to be taken (or at least announced) by a single sick individual, with cognitive capacities visibly and admittedly reduced to the tiniest species – but still enough for the warmongering and murderous impulses that marked his long life in the dominant imperial structures to come to the fore.

The decision to openly and effectively attack Russia using an individual without presidential legitimacy, but willing to kill his people in a losing war, was pronounced by an unconscious manipulated through the real system of power, the industrial, military and technological complex, currently in the hands of the criminal sect of neoconservatives who do not look at any means. even extermination, genocide and, ultimately, nuclear killing, to achieve their goals of controlling the planet globally. Many will think they are just crazy people raving about dominating the transnational levers of power, but they take themselves seriously. And we must take them seriously.

Playing with fire and with our lives

It is almost certain that Joseph Biden did not read, or was unable to read, the new nuclear doctrine of the Russian Federation, fine-tuned after NATO, following the Western coup on Maidan Square, sponsored the war conducted by the then new Nazi-Banderist regime against Russian communities in the East of the country – now Russia’s de facto territory.

Anyone who hears or reads the opinions and statements of important Western leaders realizes that, as part of their irresponsibility and their autism, they do not give importance and do not take seriously the content of this doctrine. They interpret it as a propaganda document, intended to be a deterrent, but which does not correspond to the serious intentions of the Kremlin, sunk in a kind of congenital and deterministic weakness.

That is, the West is desperately betting on a war whose ultimate objective is the destruction of the Russian Federation and its territorial transformation into a series of harmless and subservient states that allow the plundering of its goods and wealth, as happened at the end of the Soviet Union under the stylized consulate of Boris Yeltsin.

Western leaders even mock the content of this nuclear doctrine by assuring that Putin will never be able to apply it, which will be another of his manifestations of “weakness”. The worst thing is that if they pay to see it, we will all bear the price of this suicidal bet.

These leaders are mistaken and make us targets of the ricochets of their unconsciousness, as has already happened with the effects of the economic sanctions on Russia.

Let us take into account the position immediately taken by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Moscow when it signalled that the high-level decision of aggressiveness now taken changes the essence of the conflict: Washington and its satellites are responsible – and there will be a response.

The West is confusing Putin’s restraint in reaching extreme decisions with a bluff, but the result of this levity could be an exterminating nuclear war, which has already gone much further and never reached – with the exception of the Cuban crisis – such a dimension during the cold war. “Our civilization” continues to test Moscow’s limits, provocation after provocation, mainly for political and propaganda purposes. NATO is convinced that in this way, due to a hypothetical lack of response, it will be able to weaken Putin’s position, especially among the regime’s hardliners; at the same time, it tries to prove that Russia, even if it is winning the war, will end up fatally losing it before the all-powerful and invincible West. Such a strategy is the best way to the abyss.

So far, the Kremlin has not considered putting the new nuclear doctrine on the table in practical terms, but it has never ceased to be clear about its validity in the event that things change and NATO transforms its war against Russia through the intermediary into a direct military intervention using troops from Alliance countries on the ground. They were already present, it is true, disguised as mercenaries and «advisors», but now the situation has really changed, and to the most sensitive and lethal zone: the ATACAM missiles in the possession of Ukraine can only be used with the direct intervention of military armies of NATO countries, mainly the United States of America.

The aggression has undoubtedly become direct, which leads the Kremlin to consider resorting to its new nuclear doctrine. The leaders of the Russian Federation consider that the situation has degenerated into an existential threat to the country, which could imply, in extreme cases, the atomic option targeting NATO targets.

The renewed Russian doctrine establishes, for example, that in the event of aggression against the country by any non-nuclear power, but with the participation or support of a nuclear state (which is already the case today), the situation will mean a joint attack on the Russian Federation. In addition, the existence of “a critical threat to Russian sovereignty” will be considered “the basis for a nuclear response”. It will also be a “question for the use of nuclear weapons” to have “reliable data” on the mass launch of missiles or drones against Russian territory. Another point that is at the limits of the current reality states that “Russia is obliged to take into account the emergence of new sources of military threats and risks to its existence and that of its allies”. From now on, once a series of assumptions of this doctrine have been fulfilled, anything is possible: tragedy hangs, as never before, over all of us – although most of us remain oblivious thanks to the terrorist fables of global info-propaganda.

The possibility of the operational entry into force of this Russian doctrine became more serious with the willingness assumed by the top head of NATO to attack deeply into the territory of the Federation – implicitly the Kremlin itself – but it did not reach the moment of rupture, which does not mean weakness on the part of Moscow, but rather the responsible intention to, until the last and decisive moment, avoid catastrophe.

But it stands out, as a sign of irresponsibility and unscrupulousness in using the peoples – the people, in short – as cannon fodder, the fact that the United States and its satellites do not seem to hesitate to plunge the world into nuclear war as long as, through their successive and increasingly aggressive provocations, they manage to get Russia to initiate it on the battlefield.

The arrival of the ATACAM on the scene is a qualitative advance of NATO’s aggression against Russia but, according to military experts who do not wear blinders in order to rotate forever around their daughter-in-law and who were also not born with the truth as an accessory, these missiles will not significantly change the conflict in favor of Ukraine. As Russia continues to advance its military front on Ukrainian territory at ever-increasing speed, the 300-kilometre range of the new wonders of the death industry at the disposal of the Kiev Nazi-Banderites will no longer be able to reach so deeply into Russian territory. Experts say that they may support the bridgehead created by the Banderite regime in Russia’s Kursk region – and then “exchange” territory for territory in “peace negotiations” – one of those delusional dreams of a corrupt and emotionally deranged false president, but which our leaders continue to hold on to in alienated despair in the face of defeat.

THE ATTACKS, however, could be fatal for the Crimean bridge, which, if they happen, could raise the level of the Russian response to levels never reached, and Kiev is increasingly close at hand.

For now, in a first salvo against Russian territory, the bankrupt regime of Ukraine has spent 7.2 million dollars (1.2 million for ATACAM) and the Russian anti-aircraft defense has sent them to the trash, although there are always the harmful effects of the debris of the downed missiles. The 7.2 million dollars did not, of course, come out of Zelensky’s pockets but ours, where, for example, the former prime minister and current president-designate and unelected of the European Council, António Costa, got his hands on to collect 200 million euros and deposit them personally in the accounts of the Euro-Nazi-Banderist leader in Kiev.

Poisoned present?

Numerous Euro-commentators and national-commentators interpret Biden’s authorization to Zelensky to launch ATACAM missiles as a «poisoned gift» to President-elect Donald Trump, in order to try to dismantle his objective, merely verbal and pronounced by the persistent liar that he is, to quickly end the war even at the cost of Ukraine losing the territories that fell under Russian domination.

As always, these analysts drift adrift, hammering the facts in order to fit the theories that, in the meantime, someone has taught them. Or else they would not be part of the noble community of the commentary.

These theses are based on the principle that the neoconservatives who have hijacked power within the Democratic Party would already be sabotaging Trump’s presidency because they would not have an equivalent influence within the Republican Party. A holy ignorance: just consider the way neoconservatives are entering like arrows in the administration of the president who will take office on January 20. There will be differences in style, in speech, in impulses, the European Union will be forced to pay more than it does not have if it wants to continue to bet on Ukraine’s victory, but the backbone of Washington’s action will be the same. For now, despite the changing world, the empire is still the empire.

And the empire does not admit defeats in its strategic objectives, under penalty of ceasing to be so. So, the Russian Federation has to be torn to pieces, as happened with the Soviet Union, China has to be put in order on the trade, military and infrastructural aid fronts to needy countries on all continents, Iran will have to change regime to the lap of the West and Israel will have to continue to expand “Western civilization” in the Middle East by occupying the territories it wants. slaughtering and banishing hundreds of thousands of people.

So, it was with Bush father and son, Clinton, Obama, Trump, Biden – to name the most recent ones – and so it will be with Trump II.

See you one day? It will only arrive if the madmen who are on the loose in the Western centres of power do not make the planet and with the lives of all of us pay the price of their predictable and irreversible defeat. And they seem willing to do so more than ever, if they are not stopped in time.