Why are NATO’s amorals taking the moral high ground now with this creep?
❗️Join us on Telegram 
, Twitter
, and VK 
.
Russell Brand disgusts me. I like neither his affected accent nor his affected mannerisms. I abhor his “joke” about raping women and his November 23rd 2007 Irish behaviour, where he invited 12 women in his audience to have sex with him backstage, which would have resulted in him getting a very severe beat down only a few years earlier when the Troubles were in full swing.
But the really interesting thing about his rape “joke” and his Dublin behaviour is that both were totally acceptable to my betters if not to me at the time; the audience there and elsewhere laughed along to his “jokes” and almost all the women this domineering creep chose went backstage with him and no men protested, let alone gave him a well-deserved beat down.
So what has changed? Why are NATO’s amorals taking the moral high ground now with this creep? Why are the British and Irish media splashing this scumbag’s alleged sexual crimes all over their front pages and news bulletins? Why did Rupert Murdoch’s media empire and state-controlled British media combine to do this blitzkrieg on Brand when they never did a similar number on Tony Blair, Jimmy Savile, Lord Boothby, Maurice Oldfield, Cyril Smith or any of their countless other reprobates?
The answer is that though Brand, like most readers of this esteemed journal, goes against the prevailing narrative, his prominence affords him the opportunity to make a far greater splash than any of us can do. He has, at the time of writing at least, his own very popular youtube channel (which, at the very time of writing, NATO has just demonetised) and he not only gets to interview fellow high-profile heretics like Tucker Carlson and Robert Kennedy Junior but he also appears on prime time NATO TV where he expounds on topics like the CIA’s role in Covid and Ukraine where he goes against the CIA’s narrative. All that being so Brand, as the Mafia would put it, has to go.
And, in Brand’s case, that means a massive hatchet job on his already very sullied character. Which, if you think about it, might well be a lighter sentence than the bullet which awaits RFK who has chosen to take the same Grassy Knoll route as did his late father and uncle, POTUS JFK.
Whether Brand is just no platformed and libelled or whether RFK stops a CIA assassin’s bullet with his brain are of no great consequence. Because there are tens of billions of dollars at stake here in arms procurements and pharmaceuticals, both Brand and RFK have to go. They are bad both for the CIA’s business and the sacred narratives that underwrite that business.
Much the same, of course, applies to Julian Assange, who has now done the equivalent of a life tariff complements of the British judiciary which, to people of my generation, has as much legitimacy as had the judiciary of the Third Reich. As against that, NATO would argue that banging Assange up has stopped not only Assange and Wikileaks but the entire anti war and peace movements in their respective gallops and that, to them, is a very good day’s work. Mission accomplished, as mass murderer George Bush infamously put it.
Julian Assange, when he walked amongst us, succinctly explained that mission, which applies as much to the medical industrial complex as it does to the military industrial complex he was primarily concerned with. The mission is to keep the money cascading into the bank accounts of artist George Bush, artist Hunter Biden and all the other artists and con artists on the payrolls of MI6 and the CIA. And, if Assange, Brand or RFK severely disrupt those cash flows, they have to go.
Saturday 16th September saw me in Alice in Wonderland, attending a Dublin protest meeting to allow women the right to speak. Amongst the speakers NATO’s agents heckled were best-selling authors Graham Linehan and Helen Joyce, both of whom have been cancelled because they go against the narrative by bravely proclaiming the obvious truism that a woman is an adult human female.
Although Jesus famously declared that the truth will set you free, here in Ireland, such truths will put you into one of our hospital’s intensive care wards, just as in England, it puts Julian Assange into a high security prison and Russell Brand very much on the media’s back foot.
Usually, NATO need not resort to such thuggish methods. That is because, as these superlative videos here, here and here combine to show, NATO has chosen the narrow confines within which debate can happen, NATO has predicated that debate on such immutable and irrefutable bedrocks (or so they day) as female erasure and Russian erasure, and NATO has hired academic cut outs and laughable cretins like Greta Thunberg, Bana and Karine Jean-Pierre to assist the Atlantic Council and other NATO proxies to referee our thoughts and to determine what is and what is not wrongthink. They have, it seems, every angle covered.
We thus have a system where NATO’s algorithms and NATO’s funding combine to amplify NATO’s laundered messages and an army of well placed mercenary professors combine to make us fear Masha and Mishka because neither of them is on puberty blockers and both are therefore propaganda pawns for that horrible Maria Zakharova woman the BBC recently put to rights.
I mention Zakharova as creepy American transexual head banger Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, who hasn’t even completed basic military training, has been busily issuing all kinds of creepy threats against her. Although all such threats have to be taken seriously, creepy Sarah is no more a serious player than is the cross-dressing freak who is currently the Ukrainian President. They merely represent the fusion of NATO’s various cash flows, the military industrial complex and the medical industrial complex, epitomised by the large array of bio labs artists Hunter Biden and George Bush speckled Ukraine with.
What with its fig leafs of rainbow-coloured flags and its clap trap of inclusion, diversity and puberty blockers for toddlers, NATO feels it is on a roll, like Hitler’s Wehrmacht in those balmy, autumnal days of 1941 as it moved on Odessa and the Dnieper or as General Sherman’s Army were as it marched through Georgia, setting it alight from one end to the other.
And maybe it is. But these Der Untergang (Downfall) scenes of Hitler and his flunkeys in the Bunker here and here make me feel NATO’s Wehrmacht has been down this Alice in Wonderland road before. Though Hitler still had some die hard Waffen SS men at his beck and call, the sober amongst them all knew the game was up.
Just as it is up for The Gang of Eight, who control Congress and The Big Six, who control 90% of America’s media. God help those pitiful elephants if they are afraid of a mouse like Russell Brand, who is hardly worth dragging out of their bunker for their Waffen SS to shoot, just as Hitler had done to ditherers in his Reich’s own last fateful days.
For, make no mistake about it. Russell Brand is but a canary in NATO’s green-washed coal mine, showing us NATO’s game is up. Although NATO’s weaponry will stabilise its Russian border, it will also stagnate all growth, except the parasitical growth of body augmentation and mutilation NATO’s medical industrial complex thrives off.
But NATO’s medical industrial complex needs the military industrial complex to conquer new lands to pay for its nonsense. Without Ukraine, there will be no wherewithal to pay for boob jobs, never mind puberty blockers or sex change operations for children at risk. And therefore, no matter whether NATO shoots Bobby Kennedy or elects him as 47th POTUS, it makes no odds as the NATO empire, like Rome before it, has over-extended and bankrupted itself by fighting one stupid war at a time until Russia, China and allied nations copied Brand by calling time on their murders, their mutilations and their mayhem. And, whatever about Russell Brand, it will take infinitely more than Rupert Murdoch, the BBC and Ukraine’s imported Sarah Ashton-Cirillo fruit cake to stop them.
