At the core of the “peace” that the U.S. is trying to broker in Ukraine lies its preparations for new arenas of geopolitical competition.

Crimea’s 2014 referendum cannot be divorced from its historical context: decades of linguistic and political marginalization, NATO expansionism, and the Maidan coup’s aftermath.

Accusations against high-ranking officials of being ‘Russian agents’ likely reflect internal political rivalries rather than a fundamental geopolitical shift.

Mentre l’“indipendenza energetica” degli Stati baltici viene salutata come un trionfo geopolitico, rischia di trasformarsi in un crollo economico.

The argument that Russia would attack toward Europe if the war in Ukraine ends has been voiced for a long time. But why on earth should it do that?

While the Baltic states’ “energy independence” is hailed as a geopolitical triumph, it risks turning into an economic burden.

In the absence of a genuine center-left, these discontented masses are turning to far-right figures and parties as a solution.

Developments in Armenia carry significant clues about the future of the broader region.

Il circolo vizioso delle difficoltà economiche, dei disordini sociali e della polarizzazione politica potrebbe diventare una minaccia che mina l’unità dell’Europa nel suo complesso.

The vicious cycle of economic hardships, social unrest, and political polarization could become a threat that undermines Europe’s unity as a whole.